A flower can hold the memory of a garden, a celebration, or an ordinary morning worth remembering. Pressing it turns that fleeting beauty into material for cards, framed artwork, and keepsakes - but choosing a method involves more than deciding how quickly you want results.

In Pressing Flowers: 4 Methods Compared, a beginner tests a weighted book, a traditional flower press, a microwave flower press, and an iron. The experiment offers a useful starting point, not a universal verdict: different flowers respond differently, and the most convenient method is not necessarily the best choice for every project.

The biggest lesson is that flower selection, moisture, and careful handling matter alongside the equipment. Here’s how the four approaches compare, what the results can - and cannot - tell us, and how to plan a more manageable first attempt.

Key Takeaways

• Start with small batches. Some flowers wilt quickly after picking, so collect only what you can arrange promptly.
• A weighted book produced results comparable to a traditional press in this trial. Specialized equipment was not essential for attractive results.
• The microwave press offered the fastest turnaround, with some flowers finished in roughly 5–10 minutes in the demonstrator’s setup.
• Do not treat drying time as a fixed deadline. The book and traditional press needed four weeks for the tested collection.
• Test color before committing valuable blooms. Some pink flowers shifted toward purple, while Johnny-jump-ups retained their appearance particularly well.
• Avoid forcing delicate flowers off the paper. Sticking may indicate remaining moisture, although fragile flowers can also be difficult to remove.
• Choose a method around your project. Batch size, desired turnaround, and flower structure are more useful criteria than declaring one method the overall winner.

sbb-itb-80d8183

Four Methods, Four Different Trade-Offs

The experiment compared practical outcomes rather than measuring moisture levels, pressure, or color scientifically. That distinction matters: its results show what worked for one beginner with one collection of flowers.

The comparison suggests two distinct workflows: slow batch preservation and fast, hands-on experimentation. Neither is automatically superior.

Flower Selection Is the First Important Decision

Before testing equipment, the demonstrator collected flowers and foliage with different shapes, thicknesses, and colors. These included lavender, Johnny-jump-ups, snapdragons, nasturtiums, herb blossoms, yarrow, and individual rose petals.

That variety made the trial interesting, but it also introduced a challenge: some specimens began wilting before they reached the press.

Pick fewer flowers at a time

A large harvest can create a preparation bottleneck. Delicate stems wait while other flowers are trimmed and positioned.

For a first attempt, a more manageable sequence is:

1. Prepare the pressing materials.
2. Pick a small selection of flowers and leaves.
3. Arrange them immediately.
4. Collect another batch only when the first is ready.

This changes pressing from a race against wilting into a controlled creative process.

Consider structure, not just color

The demonstrator avoided whole roses and removed thicker portions of some stems. That decision highlights a useful distinction: the flower you love fresh may not be the easiest flower to flatten.

For beginners, individual petals, small blossoms, and thinner foliage offer a simpler starting point. In this experiment, lavender and Johnny-jump-ups were especially satisfying, while petunias proved delicate during removal.

The goal is not always to preserve the entire bloom. A petal, small flower cluster, or leaf can still represent the original plant beautifully in a finished design.

Method 1: A Weighted Book

The book method used blotting paper around the flowers and approximately 20 pounds of weight on the closed book.

Its strongest result was straightforward: the finished flowers looked much like those from the traditional press. That makes the book an appealing entry point for someone who wants to explore the craft before choosing dedicated equipment.

However, the experiment did not establish that every book, flower, or paper combination will perform equally well. The demonstrator also acknowledged uncertainty about whether plant moisture might affect the pages.

What the book method teaches

A book can provide compression, but compression alone does not confirm that a flower is dry. At three weeks, some flowers still adhered to the paper and tore during attempted removal. After another week, many released more successfully.

The practical lesson is to assess the flowers rather than obey the calendar. A promised two-week project can become a four-week project depending on the specimens and conditions.

The exact room humidity, paper specifications, and full drying conditions were not specified in the video, so its four-week result should be treated as an observation - not a guaranteed schedule.

Method 2: A Traditional Flower Press

The traditional press held layers of cardboard, blotting paper, and flowers between rigid boards tightened with wing nuts.

Its main benefit in the experiment was organization. Multiple sheets could be stacked into a contained workspace, making it easier to manage a collection of specimens.

Did the press outperform the book?

Not visibly in this trial. The demonstrator found no meaningful difference between the two sets of finished flowers.

That does not prove that the methods are interchangeable in every situation. The comparison did not measure pressure, standardize specimen thickness, or establish which setup would handle bulkier flowers better.

A more useful conclusion is:

For the flowers tested, a dedicated press did not produce an obvious improvement over a heavily weighted book.

For beginners, that shifts the purchasing decision away from promises of better-looking flowers and toward practical preferences: workspace, capacity, and ease of managing layers.

Method 3: A Microwave Flower Press

The microwave press was the clear favorite for speed. The device held flowers between fabric layers and was heated in short bursts, with cooling and inspection between cycles.

Some specimens were ready in approximately 5–10 minutes. Others required additional cycles.

Speed changes the learning process

The most important advantage was not simply saving weeks. It was receiving feedback quickly.

With slow pressing, a beginner may wait a month to discover that a flower was positioned poorly or changed color unexpectedly. A fast method makes it possible to adjust the next attempt during the same crafting session.

That can be particularly valuable when comparing:

• Different flower orientations
• Open blooms versus less-open blooms
• Individual petals versus larger sections
• Color changes across several varieties

The limitations still matter

The demonstrator used a small device because of microwave size, which limited the number of flowers per batch. A quick process can still become repetitive when preserving a large harvest.

The demonstrator also thought microwave-treated flowers held their color somewhat better, but that was a visual impression rather than a controlled finding.

The observed 30-second bursts are not a universal instruction. Microwave wattage, device model, and exact manufacturer guidance were not specified in the video. Any microwave method should follow the instructions for the purpose-made device being used; the wood-and-metal traditional press is a different tool.

Method 4: An Iron

The iron produced the least satisfying results in this experiment. Drying felt slow, one specimen appeared browned, and impatiens adhered strongly to the pressing material.

There was one narrower success: ironing lavender after microwave pressing seemed to make it flatter.

Why this result deserves a cautious interpretation

The demonstrator was learning the technique and explicitly questioned whether she had mastered it. The video therefore supports a conclusion about this attempt - not a claim that ironing never works.

Iron temperature, complete timing, and detailed material specifications were not specified in the video. Without those details, the demonstration is not a reproducible ironing protocol.

For a beginner deciding where to start, the iron appears less forgiving in this comparison. It also adds another handling stage when used after microwave pressing, which may be unnecessary unless extra flatness matters to the design.

Color Retention Is a Flower-Specific Question

One of the most revealing results involved color. Johnny-jump-ups retained their fresh-looking colors particularly well. Hot-pink petunias became purple, and pink phlox tested in the microwave also shifted toward purple.

This complicates the idea of a single "best" method. A process can preserve shape successfully while changing the color that made the flower appealing.

Plan for the result, not only the original bloom

For everyday garden flowers, unexpected color can become part of the creative process. For a wedding bouquet or another meaningful arrangement, accurate color may matter much more.

A practical approach is to test a representative bloom before committing the entire collection, when enough flowers are available. Compare the outcome with a photograph of the fresh flower rather than relying solely on memory.

The video did not assess long-term fading or explain the chemistry behind the color changes. Its results demonstrate initial appearance, not permanent color stability.

Build a Small Experiment Before Making a Keepsake

The strongest part of this demonstration is its willingness to compare rather than assume. A beginner can make that approach more informative with a simple record.

For each batch, note:

• Flower or leaf type
• Method used
• Date picked and pressed
• Whether the stem or thick base was removed
• Initial color and finished color
• Ease of removal
• Suitability for the intended project

Photographing each sheet before covering it also helps identify specimens later. In the video, some dried material became difficult to recognize - a reminder that preservation can change both shape and appearance.

For a fairer comparison, use similar specimens of the same flower across methods. Otherwise, a difference attributed to equipment may actually come from the flower itself.

From Pressed Flowers to Finished Projects

Cards, framed compositions, and floral lettering were among the project ideas discussed. Each places a slightly different demand on the material.

• Cards and lettering: Small, relatively flat pieces offer flexibility when arranging a design.
• Framed compositions: Leaves and stems can be as useful as flowers for creating balance and structure.
• Sentimental keepsakes: Recognizable shapes or meaningful plant choices may matter more than perfectly preserved color.

The demonstrator had not yet settled on a storage system or completed the craft projects. Those details were not specified in the video, so the experiment should not be treated as a complete guide to long-term preservation.

The Best Method Is the One That Fits Your Priorities

This four-method trial does not identify a universal winner. Instead, it reveals a practical choice.

A weighted book can be enough for an accessible first experiment. A traditional press offers a tidy way to manage layers. A microwave press provides speed and rapid feedback, while the iron delivered less consistent results in this beginner’s hands.

Start with a few available flowers rather than an irreplaceable collection. Compare their shape, color, and ease of handling, then choose the process that supports the keepsake you want to create. Successful pressing is not just about flattening a bloom - it is about learning which details of that flower you most want to preserve.

Source: "We Pressed Flowers 4 Different Ways... Here's What Happened" - Waardenburg Family Farm, YouTube, Jul 16, 2026 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rL6FWCMt9RM

Related Blog Posts

• Flower Pressing Guide
• Microwave Press Kit vs Book Press For Beginners
• 5 Wildflower Pressing Mistakes
• Microwave Press vs Book Press for Card Making